3 Responses to “Spotted at the debate”

1. Thomas Says:
   December 1st, 2007 at 12:36 pm

   Paul Gourley did a lot less of these interviews, but he had the right idea. More field reps translates into more chapters, more activists, and more activists translates into stronger chapters and more votes and volunteers for our Republican nominee for President.

   Charlie would be safe in his Washington HQ if CR chapters dwindle and disappear over the next couple years. That’s the problem with these “revolutions” each time they happen. The teenage rebels kick out their elders, and then they act shocked when the foundations fall out from underneath their feet.

2. Pete Says:
   December 1st, 2007 at 6:38 pm

   Now that this debate has been exposed as a liberal stoogefest these remarks seems especially imprudent.

3. On the contrary... Says:
   December 1st, 2007 at 10:57 pm

   Charlie was speaking about the type of venue the debate provided and if anyone argues that opening up politics to more citizen participation and transparency is a bad thing…they are retarded.

   He’s right that campaigns are/should be reaching out more to the new world of social networks, blogs, etc online. The CNN media-bias has now become more apparent as they stifled GOP voters from asking what really should have been asked. It’s too bad CNN pulled their stunts, but this type of format will be increasingly the new model for politics.

   And whoever the Maine stooge is that calls himself “Thomas” is obviously new to this game. Paul Gourley is hardly an example to follow unless you think taking $15,000 bonuses and then quitting your job is the “right idea” that you were talking about. It doesn’t matter how many field reps you have if they’re all forced to sleep in their cars til noon and don’t do any work…

   Go back to getting Nate his drinks and answering his phone calls…

Comments