« Pink, Red, White, & Blue: Berkeley College Republicans | Home | Bye-Bye Red Ken and Hello Boris »

Less is More: Changing Campaign Finance

By lace | May 2, 2008

Every little bit does count, especially for Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. As a general rule, campaign cash seems to be leaning more on the petty side as opposed to the elite building up a candidate’s war chest. From the year 2000 up to the recent April FEC reporting quarter, contributions less than $200 have increasingly made up a large portion of a candidate’s treasury. More than half of Clinton and Obama’s funds have come from small donations while Senator McCain’s small contributions make up a slightly less proportion. This is largely due to successful direct mail fundraising and the utilization of the internet.

Fundraising as we know it is turning over a new leaf…

Barack Obama Cash on Hand: $51,074,000
55% - $200 or less

Hillary Clinton Cash on Hand: $31,792,198
50%- $200 or less

John McCain Cash on Hand: $11,579,714
20%- $200 or less

Perhaps this is a sign of increased party polarization, or maybe Americans are realizing the importance of political participation…either way I’m glad I sent a check to McCain.

Topics: John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, fundraising |

One Response to “Less is More: Changing Campaign Finance”

  1. Jared Anderson Says:
    May 2nd, 2008 at 10:22 pm

    Historically the Republican Party’s proportion of small donations has been higher than the Democratic Party’s, so I can’t help but feel as though John McCain’s small amount is reflecting many conservatives dissatisfaction with his candidacy. I have no doubt that conservatives will vote for McCain in November - the challenge is getting all of our fellow conservatives to help now by donating or volunteering.

Comments