Featured Post

National College Democrats officer levels wild accusations against CRN

The national council vice-chair of the College Democrats of America, B. Lee Drake, lashed out at the CRNC today in the University of New Mexico campus newspaper. After attacking illegal immigrant events at NYU and Boise State, Mr. Drake wrote: Unfortunately, it got a lot worse this month when the Center...

Read More

A Dollar a Day (adds up way faster than you think)

Posted by kittyhawk | Posted in Barack Obama, health care policy, liberalism | Posted on 25-06-2009

0

While we’re on the subject of healthcare and failing government policies, take note of this brilliant idea.

Is it just me, or is everything wrong with using taxpayers’ money to fund this program? Since when does the government subsidize morality? Oh, wait, it’s not morality, abstinence is not required! Plus it’s totally discriminatory, because unless you had a sister who gave birth before age 18 and (evidently) do not have a family member who’s obtained a college degree, you’re not eligible! It’s just like liberals, though, when “creative ways are needed” to address an issue they get creative with other people’s money.

Not only that, let’s do the math here: 6/125 (# of girls in the program who got pregnant or otherwise dropped out) > 7.2/1,000 (average national teen birth rate) Granted, the people choosing the lucky participants say that this is a high-risk group. But if you ask me, the criteria they’re using are catching low-risk young women: Are you more or less likely to get pregnant as a teen after watching your sister go through it, especially if you’re still in school and working toward college?

One more quick calculation: 12 (years program has been running) x $75,000 (per year cost) = $900,000 To keep 119 girls from getting pregnant. “If it works”, Mr. Program Director? When are we going to make the tough call?

More disturbing is the Federal budget item associated with this happy statement. If the above is an example of them “carefully testing innovative approaches”, that money is doomed before it’s spent. Nothing new, I know. Just another example of well-intentioned politicians doing as they please with tax dollars, and botching the job in the process. But we all know about the road to hell and good intentions!

April Fools

Posted by cr nation | Posted in Barack Obama | Posted on 01-04-2009

0

n705940432_6439617_6599497.jpg

Obama’s Approval Rating Slips

Posted by sage of monticello | Posted in Barack Obama | Posted on 24-02-2009

1

For the first time, Obama’s approval rating slips below 60%.

obama.gif

What else is new…

Posted by sage of monticello | Posted in Barack Obama, Congress, Congressional Democrats, facebook, young voters | Posted on 24-02-2009

2

At the present time, 60% of Facebook users think NEITHER Barack Obama or the new Democratic Congress is doing a good job handling the economy.

Let it begin: Obama’s first official approval rating

Posted by sage of monticello | Posted in Barack Obama, Pres. Obama, polls | Posted on 24-01-2009

0

Gallup finds that after three days in office 68% of Americans approve of the job he is doing.

How does that compare to past Presidents? Consider this:

Gallup’s initial job approval ratings for President John F. Kennedy were 72 percent; Dwight Eisenhower, 68 percent; Jimmy Carter, 66 percent; Richard Nixon, 59 percent; George W. Bush, 57 percent; and Ronald Regan and George H.W. Bush, 51 percent.