Featured Post

“Ronstock”

If you’re a Ron Paul fan (and there are some out there, judging by our poll), this two-part series of Ron Paul’s travels through Iowa is for you. Enjoy.

Read More

Cocky or Confident?

Posted by sage of monticello | Posted in Campaign 2008 | Posted on 21-10-2008

0

“We need tax increases….there are plenty of ‘rich’ people out there we can tax”

Typically, Democrats don’t admit stuff like this, unless they think they can win without hiding the ball…

A Liberal Supermajority

Posted by sage of monticello | Posted in Campaign 2008 | Posted on 17-10-2008

1

If this does scare you; if this doesn’t cause you to volunteer for John McCain, a Republican Senate candidate, or for a local GOP Congressman, then you just don’t care and probably shouldn’t call yourself a College Republican.

Read it.

“Joe the Plumber”

Posted by sage of monticello | Posted in Barack Obama, Campaign 2008 | Posted on 16-10-2008

0

Joe’s three letter word: J-O-B-S

Posted by sage of monticello | Posted in Campaign 2008, Joe Biden | Posted on 16-10-2008

0

Wait….that’s actually four letters. And for the record, Joe Biden should never be allowed to poke fun at George Bush

Not guilty by, guilty OF…

Posted by sage of monticello | Posted in Barack Obama, Campaign 2008 | Posted on 06-10-2008

0

From an article about Barack Obama and his ties to domestic terrorist William Ayers:

Democrats and their friends in the press are moose-hunting angry this morning over Sarah Palin’s recent comment that Senator Obama “pals around with terrorists” which she made in reference to his being pals with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. The big line of defense we hear against this charge is “guilt by association”. Their argument is absolutely true, if the charge is terrorism. You can’t call Obama guilty of terrorism merely for associating with terrorists.

Of course, it’s a straw man position. He isn’t being accused of any guilt which ought to be Ayers’ burden. He’s being accused of precisely what he is guilty of: associating with terrorists. That’s not guilty by association. It’s guilty OF association … association with information, I might add, because there’s no way he didn’t know about Ayers. Even if he didn’t know about the terrorism, a loudmouth radical like Ayers doesn’t keep his loudmouth radicalism under wraps. It was on account of his leftism that he and Obama made such frequent and successful allies.